LIIofIndia Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Indian Parliamentary Research Service Legislative Summaries

Parliamentary Research Service
You are here:  LIIofIndia >> Databases >> Indian Parliamentary Research Service Legislative Summaries >> 2008 >> [2008] INPRSLS 5

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Documents | Noteup | LawCite | Help

The Pesticides Management Bill, 2008 - Legislative Brief [2008] INPRSLS 5 (21 October 2008)

Legislative Brief

The Pesticides Management Bill, 2008


The Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on 21st October, 2008.


The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Agriculture (Chairperson: Shri Mohan Singh) submitted its report on February 18th, 2009.

Highlights of the Bill

Key Issues and Analysis


Recent Briefs:


The Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Bill, 2008

June 19, 2009


The National Commission for Heritage Sites Bill, 2009

September 30, 2009


Avinash Celestine

avinash@prsindia.org


October 12, 2009


PRS Legislative ResearchCentre for Policy Research Dharma Marg Chanakyapuri New Delhi – 110021

Tel: (011) 2611 5273-76, Fax: 2687 2746



PART A: HIGHLIGHTS OF THE BILL1

Context

The import, manufacture, distribution and use of insecticides (including pesticides) in India are currently governed by the provisions of the Insecticides Act, 1968. The Act puts in place a registration system for pesticides, and a licencing regime for manufacturers and distributors of pesticides to be administered by state governments. A procedure for inspection and testing of pesticides is also specified. A total of 217 pesticides have been registered for use in the country and thirty-three pesticides are banned.2

The total consumption of pesticides in the country was around 55,000 tons in 2006-07.3 Four states – Andhra Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh, account for around half the pesticides consumed.4 A Joint Parliamentary Committee, set up in 2003, to probe the issue of pesticide residues in soft drinks, had recommended changes to the Insecticides Act, including the mandatory fixation of tolerance limits for pesticide residues on crops.5

The Pesticides Management Bill, 2008 seeks to replace the Insecticides Act, 1968. It establishes a central pesticides board to advise the government on issues relating to pesticide use and regulation. The Bill provides for a registration committee to register pesticides and monitor their use and provides for a system of licencing, inspection and testing administered by state governments.

Key Features


Table 1: Authorities and offices set up under the Bill

Authority / Office

Functions / Powers

Composition / Eligibility

Authorities/ Offices set up under the Central Government

Central Pesticides Board

To advise the government on standards for the manufacture, sale and distribution of pesticides, and their monitoring and disposal.

It shall also advise the government on safety and toxicity standards.

38 members; 10 shall be ex-officio government officials, 18 shall be representatives of various ministries, government bodies and institutions; 10 shall be nominees of the central government.

Registration Committee

To register pesticides, restrict or prohibit their use, and prescribe guidelines for the manufacture and advertising of pesticides.

Total of 10 members ex-officio from different ministries, government departments and institutions.

Central Pesticides Laboratory

To carry out functions under the Act.

Other accredited laboratories may also carry out functions of CPL. Officers of such labs cannot have a financial interest in the pesticides business.

Authorities/ Offices set up under the State Government

Licencing Officer

To licence manufacture and distribution of pesticides. Can also revoke or suspend licences.

To be appointed by State governments; qualifications to be prescribed.

Pesticide Inspectors

To take samples of pesticides for analysis; to enter / search premises or examine / seize documents or stop the distribution of pesticides if violations are suspected, with the permission of magistrate.

Qualifications to be prescribed by central or state government; cannot have financial interest in manufacture/import/export or sale of pesticides.

Pesticide Analysts

To test samples of pesticides according to provisions of the Act.

Qualifications to be prescribed; no financial interest in pesticides.

Sources: The Pesticides Management Bill, 2008 ; PRS

Comparison between the Bill and the Insecticides Act, 1968

The Bill replaces the Insecticides Act, 1968. While the Bill is similar to the Act, it brings about changes in terms of the types of substances covered, the powers of the registration committee and the conditions of registration (Table 2).

Table 2: Main Changes in the Bill as compared with the Insecticides Act, 1968

Topic

The Insecticides Act, 1968

The Bill

Coverage

Covers insecticides which are defined as any substance included in the Schedule to the Act.

Covers pesticides which are defined as any substance of chemical or biological origin used to control the spread of pests in agricultural commodities or animal feed.

Powers of registration committee

Power to cancel the registration of an insecticide lies with the central government.

Committee can suspend or cancel registration in case of violations of the Act or due to adverse impact on crops, humans or animals.

Conditions and Process of Registration

The Act did not require tolerance limits for pesticide residues to be specified. Tolerance limits are specified under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

There is no protection of data submitted for registration. Same data could be used by multiple applicants.

Bill requires tolerance limits to be specified as a condition for registration. Such limits are specified by the Food Safety and Standards Authority, set up under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

Data submitted for registration by one applicant cannot be used by others for three years, without permission.

Sources: The Insecticides Act, 1968; The Pesticides Management Bill, 2008; PRS

Definition of Pesticides

T

Clause 3(s), Preamble, Statement of Objects and Reasons

he Bill defines a pesticide as a substance of chemical or biological origin intended to destroy or control the spread of any pests in agricultural commodities or animal feeds.

Pesticides used to control pests in non-agricultural settings (other than households) may not be covered by this definition, leaving such substances unregulated. The preamble of the Bill aims to regulate pesticides “with a view to control pests”, but does not restrict this to agriculture only. The Insecticides Act, 1968 covers substances used outside agriculture. The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Agriculture has recommended that pesticides used in health care also be covered under the definition.6



T

Clause 12(5)

olerance limits for Pesticide Residues

Currently the Insecticides Act does not regulate residue limits. The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 provides for residue limits on food items. This Act is being replaced by the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, which exempts farmers from its provisions. Under this Act, no article of food can contain pesticide residues in excess of tolerance limits specified by regulations.7

According to the Bill, no pesticide can be registered for import or manufacture unless its tolerance limits are specified for residues on crops and commodities under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. 8 This raises two issues.

Firstly, the relevant sections of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 have not yet been brought into force.

Secondly, all pesticides which are currently registered under the Insecticides Act, 1968, will be deemed to be registered under the provisions of the Bill. Tolerance limits are not specified for some currently registered pesticides (as pointed out by the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Residues in and Safety Standards for Soft Drinks, Fruit Juice and Other Beverages). Thus, some pesticides registered under the Bill will not have tolerance limits fixed for them.

Penalties for Misuse of Powers

The Bill puts in place a regime for the collection of pesticide samples by Pesticide Inspectors, and for the testing of such samples by pesticide analysts. Inspectors can enter and search premises, examine or seize documents, and stop the distribution of pesticides, in case they suspect violations of the Act.

The Parliamentary Standing Committee has recommended that the liability and accountability of pesticide inspectors be fixed in a manner similar to that specified for inspectors under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, or Food Safety Officers under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. As of now, the Bill does not specify any penalties for inspectors or pesticide analysts. The Committee recommended that pesticide inspectors who exercise their powers vexatiously or without reasonable grounds be fined Rs 10,000-Rs 25,000, while analysts be fined Rs 25,000-1 lakh for similar reasons.

Some Recommendations of the Standing Committee

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Agriculture had made certain recommendations with respect to the powers of the registration committee and with respect to the data protection provisions under the Bill.

T

Clauses 11(2)(ii) and 33

he Bill empowers both the government and the registration committee to prohibit or restrict pesticide use. The Standing Committee had recommended that the power to prohibit the use of a pesticide rest with the government, while the power to restrict its use be with the registration committee.



T

Clause 12(6)

he Bill does not allow data submitted along with an application to be reused by another applicant for 3 years without permission. The Committee recommended that this data protection period be raised to 5 years.





1The procedure is part of an international convention which regulates the import and export of hazardous chemicals.

1Notes

. This Brief has been written on the basis of the Pesticides Management Bill, 2008, which was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on February 26th, 2009. on 21st October, 2008. The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Agriculture (Chairperson: Shri Mohan Singh) submitted its report on February 18th, 2009.

2. See http://cibrc.nic.in/

3. Adapted from data on pesticide production and imports. See Lok Sabha unstarred question No. 1984 answered on 13th march, 2008.

4. For all India figures see http://www.dacnet.nic.in/eands/At_Glance_2008/ch_15/tb15.3.xls (table 15.2). For state-wise consumption up to 2004-05 see http://cibrc.nic.in/pestconsum.htm.

5. Report of Joint Committee on Pesticide Residues in and Safety Standards for Soft Drinks, Fruit Juice and Other Beverages; available at http://parliamentofindia.nic.in/ls/jpc/jpc-prsfb.htm

6. “Pesticides Management Bill, 2008”, 46th report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture, February 2009.

7. Section 21(1) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

8. Section 16(2)(b) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

9. See Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Part XIV.

DISCLAIMER: This document is being furnished to you for your information. You may choose to reproduce or redistribute this report for non-commercial purposes in part or in full to any other person with due acknowledgement of PRS Legislative Research (“PRS”). The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the author(s). PRS makes every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information, but PRS does not represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete. PRS is an independent, not-for-profit group. This document has been prepared without regard to the objectives or opinions of those who may receive it.



8


LIIofIndia: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.liiofindia.org/in/other/INPRSLS/2008/5.html