You are here:
CommonLII >>
Databases >>
Special Court for Sierra Leone >>
2005 >>
[2005] SCSL 45
[Database Search]
[Name Search]
[Recent Decisions]
[Noteup]
[Download]
[Help]
PROSECUTOR v ISSA HASSAN SESAY & ORS - RULING ON THE ORAL APPLICATION OF THE PROSECUTION TO VARY THE PROTECTIVE MEASURES OF WITNESS TF1-141 - Case No. SCSL-04-15-T [2005] SCSL 45 (6 April 2005)
O
SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE
JOMO KENYATTA
ROAD • FREETOWN • SIERRA LEONE
PHONE: +1 212 963 9915
Extension: 178 7000 or +39 0831 257000 or +232 22 295995
FAX:
Extension: 178 7001 or +39 0831 257001 Extension: 174 6996 or +232 22
295996
TRIAL CHAMBER I
|
Before:
|
Hon. Justice Benjamin Mutanga Itoe, Presiding Judge Hon. Justice Bankole
Thompson Hon. Justice Pierre Boutet
|
|
Registrar:
|
Robin Vincent
|
|
Date:
|
6th of April 2005
|
|
PROSECUTOR
|
Against
|
ISSA HASSAN SESAY MORRIS KALLON AUGUSTINE
GBAO (Case No. SCSL-04-15-T)
|
RULING ON THE ORAL APPLICATION OF THE PROSECUTION TO VARY
THE PROTECTIVE MEASURES OF WITNESS TF1-141
|
Office of the Prosecutor:
|
|
Defence Counsel for Issa Hassan
Sesay:
|
|
Luc Côté Lesley Taylor Peter Harrison
|
|
Wayne Jordash Sareta Ashraph
Defence Counsel for Morris Kallon:
|
|
|
Shekou Touray Melron Nicol-Wilson
|
|
|
Defence Counsel for Augustine
Gbao: Andreas O’Shea John Cammegh
|
- This
is the Ruling of the Chamber on the Prosecution’s application to vary the
protective measures of Witness TF1-141.
- On
the 18th of January 2005 during the trial of this case,
the Prosecution made an application that Prosecution Witness TF1-141 be
permitted
to testify via closed-circuit television and that there be a support
person from the Victims and Witnesses Unit present with the
Witness during his
testimony.
- The
Prosecution conceded that it could not establish the age of Witness TF1-141. A
nurse had estimated that he was approximately
14 years of age in December 2000
and thus, while he is clearly a young person, the Witness may be over 18 years
of age. The Prosecution
further conceded that because of this, the Witness
would not automatically be entitled to testify via closed-circuit television
pursuant
to this Chamber’s Decision on Prosecution Motion for
Modification of Protective Measures for Witnesses. The Prosecution
submitted, however, that this Witness would qualify as a vulnerable witness,
despite his age.
- The
Prosecution submitted as a matter of law that the Trial Chamber nonetheless has
the discretion to grant these special protective
measures for the testimony of
Witness TF1-141 pursuant to Rules 75(B)(i)(c) and 85(D) of the Rules of
Procedure and Evidence.
- In
order to establish the factual foundation for its application and to provide
supporting expert guidance to the Chamber on this
issue, the Prosecution called
Ms. An Michels, the psychologist attached to the Victims and Witnesses Unit and
filed a statutory declaration
that she had prepared as Exhibit 15. Ms. Michels
was questioned by the Prosecution and cross-examined by Defence Counsel for all
three Accused.
- In
the course of her testimony, Ms. Michels stated that from her observations she
has concluded that Witness TF1-141 suffered from
post-traumatic stress. She
found that the Witness exhibits clearly the three groups of symptoms of
post-traumatic stress and that
he falls within the category of a witness who is
severely traumatised. She also emphasized that he was particularly vulnerable
given
the level of his mental development due to his young age, the fact that he
was a child ex-combatant and the fact that he was confronted
with the traumatic
events when he was much younger. As a result of these factors, she opined that
this particular witness has a
higher risk for retraumatisation from testifying.
In light of her findings, Ms. Michels recommended that the Witness testify via
closed-circuit television as this would create a quieter and less overwhelming
environment for him and also prevent a direct confrontation.
In addition, she
recommended that he testify in the presence of a support person from the Victims
and Witness Unit with whom the
Witness is familiar in order to increase his
comfort level and to control his feelings of fear and depersonalisation.
- At
the end of their cross-examination of Ms. Michels, Counsel for all three Accused
indicated that they did not oppose the Prosecution’s
application.
- Based
on the foregoing considerations, this Chamber is satisfied that the Prosecution
has established a case to justify the exercise
of the Chamber’s discretion
under the Rules to permit Witness TF1-141 to testify via closed-circuit
television in the presence
of a support person.
- The
Chamber accordingly GRANTS the Prosecution’s application and
ORDERS as follows:
- That
Witness TF1-141 shall testify via closed-circuit television;
- That
a support person from the Victims and Witness Unit shall be present with the
Witness while he is testifying; and
- That
the support person shall not communicate with the Witness during testimony
except as so directed by the Chamber.
.
|
Done at Freetown this 6th day of April 2005
|
Hon. Judge Pierre Boutet
|
Hon. Judge Benjamin Mutanga Itoe
|
Hon. Judge Bankole Thompson
|
|
Presiding Judge Trial Chamber I
|
|
[Seal of the Special Court for Sierra Leone]
|
CommonLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.commonlii.org/sl/cases/SCSL/2005/45.html