You are here:
CommonLII >>
Databases >>
Special Court for Sierra Leone >>
2007 >>
[2007] SCSL 69
[Database Search]
[Name Search]
[Recent Decisions]
[Noteup]
[Download]
[Help]
PROSECUTOR v ALEX TAMBA BRIMA & ORS - DECISION ON URGENT PROSECUTION MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE PAGE LIMIT FOR ITS APPEAL BRIEF - Case No.SCSL-2004-16-A [2007] SCSL 69 (24 August 2007)
O
SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE
JOMO KENYATTA
ROAD • FREETOWN • SIERRA LEONE
PHONE: +1 212 963 9915
Extension: 178 7000 or +39 0831 257000 or +232 22 295995
FAX:
Extension: 178 7001 or +39 0831 257001 Extension: 174 6996 or +232 22
295996
IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER
|
Before:
|
Justice Renate Winter, Pre-Hearing Judge
|
|
Registrar:
|
Herman von Hebel, Registrar
|
|
Date:
|
24 August 2007
|
|
PROSECUTOR
|
Against
|
ALEX TAMBA BRIMA BRIMA BAZZY KAMARA SANTIGIE BORBOR
KANU (Case No.SCSL-2004-16-A)
|
DECISION ON URGENT PROSECUTION MOTION
FOR AN
EXTENSION OF THE PAGE LIMIT FOR ITS APPEAL BRIEF
|
Office of the Prosecutor:
|
|
Defence Counsel for Alex Tamba Brima:
|
|
Dr. Christopher Staker
|
|
Mr. Kojo Graham
Defence Counsel for Brima Bazzy
Kamara:
|
|
|
Mr. Andrew Daniels
|
|
|
Defence Counsel for Santigie Borbor
Kanu: Mr. Agibola E. Manley-Spain
|
I, RENATE WINTER, the Pre-Hearing Judge in this case,
SEISED of the “Urgent Prosecution Motion for an Extension of the
Page Limit for its Appeal Brief” filed on 2 August 2007 (the
“Motion”);
HAVING Received and Considered the “Brima
– Kamara Joint Response to Urgent Prosecution Motion for an Extension of
the Page Limit for its Appeal Brief”
filed on 20 August 2007 (the
“Response”) and the “Urgent Prosecution Reply to Brima –
Kamara Response to
Prosecution Motion for an Extension of the Page Limit for its
Appeal Brief” filed on 22 August 2007 (the “Reply”);
NOTING that Kanu has not filed a response within the time limit
stipulated under Rule 7(C) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence;
HEREBY DECIDES:
SUBMISSIONS
- The
Prosecution requests an extension of the page limit for its appeal brief to no
more than 250 pages. The Prosecution recalls Article
6(E)(i) of the Practice
Direction on Filing Documents before the Special Court for Sierra Leone, which
limits the Prosecution’s
consolidated appeal brief to 170 pages or 50,000
words, whichever is greater. The Prosecution notes that it is not obliged to
file
a consolidated appeal brief, and it is seeking an upper limit of 250 pages
which is less than the combined page limit of 300 which
would apply if the
Prosecution were to file separate briefs in respect of each convicted person.
Therefore, the Prosecution submits
that the motion for an extension of the page
limit to 250 is proportionate, reasonable, and necessary to enable the
Prosecution to
adequately address all of its nine grounds of appeal.
- In
their Response, Brima and Kamara do not object to the Prosecution’s
motion, but request that should the Appeals Chamber decide
to grant the
Prosecution request, they should similarly be granted an extension of 20 pages
each so as to allow them to “adequately
respond to all matters of fact and
law raised by the Prosecution in their written
submissions.”[1]
- The
Prosecution also filed a Reply in which it submits that it is premature for the
Defence to request an extension of the page limit
for their responses to the
Prosecution’s appeal brief before it is filed.
DELIBERATIONS
- Article
6(G) of the Practice Direction on Filing Documents before the Special Court for
Sierra Leone empowers a Judge or Chamber of
the Special Court to authorize an
extension of the page limits prescribed in Article 6(E) where the Party seeking
such an extension
shows the existence of ‘exceptional circumstances that
necessitate the oversized filing’.
- I
am persuaded by the Prosecution submission that its nine grounds of appeal and
the length and complexity of the Trial Judgement
constitute exceptional
circumstances warranting an extension of the page limit for its consolidated
brief.
- Furthermore,
it is my opinion that the joint response filed by Brima and Kamara must be
understood as a request for an extension
of the page limit for their appeal
briefs, and not as a request relating to their responses to the
Prosecution’s yet-to-be-filed
consolidated appeal brief.
- Kanu
has neither filed a response to the Prosecution’s Motion nor requested an
extension of the page limit for its appeal brief.
Nevertheless, as the Statute
of the Special Court requires equal treatment of persons similarly situated
before it, a privilege accorded
to one convicted person must be accorded to all
others.
FOR THE FOREGOING REASONS,
I HEREBY GRANT the Motion and authorise the Prosecution to file an
appeal brief of no more than 250 pages and authorise extensions of no more than
20 pages each for the appeal briefs of Brima and Kamara. I hereby further
authorise that Kanu may also file an appeal brief with
an extension of no more
than 20 pages.
Done at Freetown this 24th Day of August 2007.

Renate Winter
Pre-Hearing Judge
[Seal of the Special Court for Sierra Leone]
[1] Brima –
Kamara Joint Response to Urgent Prosecution Motion for an Extension of the Page
Limit for its Appeal Brief, Case No.
SCSL-2004-16-A, 20 August 2007, para. 5.
CommonLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.commonlii.org/sl/cases/SCSL/2007/69.html