![]() |
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
High Court of Swaziland |
[Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent Decisions] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]
Sentence – where knife used
Crim.Case No.88/01
In the matter between:
SIBUSISO KWESU
NKAMBULE
VS
REX
CORAM : MASUKU
J.
For the Crown : Ms N. Lukhele
For the Accused : In
person
1st November 2001
You have been convicted of the crime of culpable homicide. By any
standards, this is a very serious crime which involves the taking
away the God
given right of life of another person. You should not take away what you have
not given.
In assessing the appropriate sentence, I will take into
account the useful remarks of Jones J. in S v QAMATA 1997 (SA) 480 at
499. The learned Judge had this to say: -
“In weighing
these considerations, I should bear in mind the need-
| (a) | to show an understanding of and compassion for the weaknesses of human |
beings and
the reasons why they commit serious crimes, by avoiding an
overly
harsh sentence.
| (b) | to demonstrate the outrage of society at the commission of serious crimes by |
imposing
an appropriate, and, if necessary, a severe sentence; and
©
to pass a sentence which is balanced, sensible, and motivated by sound
reasons
and which will therefore meet the approval of the
majority of law abiding
citizens. If I do not, the
administration of justice will not enjoy the confidence
and
respect of society.”
I have elicited factors that weigh in your
favour in view of your age and also considering that you are unrepresented. Ms
Lukhele
has also been of great assistance in this regard and the Court marks its
appreciation to her for her fairness.
Factors that weigh in your favour
are the following.
-Your age, which is 15
-You are a first
offender
-You have exhibited signs of penitence
-You never intended to
commit this crime
-That this incident will haunt you for the rest of your
life
That having been established, there is nothing to gainsay the fact
that this offence is serious. Too many lives have been lost in
Swaziland using
knives, particularly the Okapi, which you also used to stab the deceased. It is
probably high time that the sale
of this brand of knives be banned in view of
the havoc and pain its use has occasioned to many families in this
Kingdom.
I can do no better than quote from an excerpt by Dunn J. in
THE KING vs DUMISA TITO SIMELANE & ANOTHER CRIM. CASE NO. 122/96,
(unreported) where the learned Judge had this to say at page 2 –
3:
“There are far too many cases of innocent lives being taken
in this country with
the use of knives. Time and again one finds
people readily resorting to the use of
knives at the lease
provocation or for the most trivial reasons. Invariably, the
person
who is convicted cuts a sorrowful and pitiful figure as it dawns on him
in
the course of the trial that indeed, the reason for having used
the knife was a
senseless and most trivial one. This factor alone
makes the task of the Court in
determining an appropriate sentence
most difficult. The Court is at that stage
faced with the immediate
pleas and concerns of the particular accused appearing
before
it.
There is of course the other side of the coin and that is the
feelings of the relatives
of the person whose life has been taken.
Those feelings are rarely ever placed
before the Court unless of
course those relatives or some of them were witnesses
to the incident
and were called to give evidence in Court. In that way, the
Court
can get some measure of their feelings.”
The
provocation in this case and the ensuing fight did not require the use of any
weapon. The practice of carrying knives engenders
a false sense of superiority
and security and often prompts the armed person to invite trouble, in order to
enable him to unleash
his deadly weapon on an unsuspecting
adversary.
Carrying a knife for no reason when attending a social
gathering is totally out of order. You have ruined your record at such an
early
age. Do not however run from your mistakes – learn from them and they
will make you, better-not bitter. Turn your scars
into stars and preach the
gospel that the carrying and use of knives unnecessarily propels one into a
collision course with the wheels
of justice.
The sentence I intend to
impose is one that will in my view serve an individual and general deterrent.
It will take into account
the seriousness of the crime the interests of society
and be flavoured with mercy.
I have considered in this case, the
provisions of Section 305 and 306 of the C.P.&E as possible sentences.
These are in my view
unsuitable in your case in view of the seriousness of the
offence and the fact that if I were to impose them, to many, it will seem
as
though justice has not been done and people, particularly the deceased’s
relatives may be tempted to take the law into their
own hands. This would
indeed be highly regrettable.
You are hereby sentenced to seven (7) years
imprisonment four (4) of which be and are hereby suspended for a period of three
(3) years.
The suspension is subject to the condition that you are not, during
this period, to be convicted of an offence in respect of which
violence to
another is an element. The sentence be and is hereby backdated to
28th September 2000, being the date of your arrest. I further order
that you be kept at the Juvenile Correctional Institution to serve
your sentence
there. Should you attain the age of eighteen (18), whilst in custody, which is
unlikely, you are to be transferred
to the Young Peoples’ Correctional
Institution.
T.S. MASUKU
JUDGE
CommonLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.commonlii.org/sz/cases/SZHC/2001/6.html